In case of multiple return values, it works similar to the original
proposal. This should work with multiple return values. As I stated, this
isn't a complete proposal.
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 10:55:35 PM UTC-7, MUNGAI wrote:
>
> I agree,
> Some of the proposals introduce more trouble
I see your point. I think it may be better to* narrow the scope* of what
should be improved.
For the most part, I like the simplicity of error handling in Go, but I
would very much like a less verbose
way to pass errors.
Technically we are not talking about handling the errors but we just want
On Saturday, February 8, 2020 at 2:14:31 AM UTC-7, Brian Candler wrote:
> On Saturday, 8 February 2020 07:02:34 UTC, addi t0t08 wrote:
>>
>> I think the keyword we are looking for is `pass`. Similarly, `pass` only
>> needs to return if err != nil.
>>
>> func writ
On Saturday, February 8, 2020 at 10:55:10 AM UTC-7, Brian Candler wrote:
>
> On Saturday, 8 February 2020 10:33:03 UTC, addi t0t08 wrote:
>>
>> No, 'pass' accepts an error type. in this case Foo function must return
>> an error type otherwise that would be a co
