Re: [go-nuts] Re: pure-Go MATLAB file I/O package ?

2025-11-03 Thread a.ko...@gmail.com
Hi! Such a package now exists: **github.com/scigolib/matlab** (v0.1.1-beta) ✅ Pure Go (no CGo) ✅ Read/Write v5-v7.3 formats ✅ All numeric types + complex numbers ✅ 90% test coverage, production tested ```bash go get github.com/scigolib/matlab@latest ``` Docs: https://github.com/scigolib/matlab

Re: [go-nuts] Re: Scientific file formats: HDF5,FITS, NetCDF?

2025-10-30 Thread a.ko...@gmail.com
Subject: Pure Go HDF5 implementation - 9 years later Hi all, Replying to this 9-year-old thread because the original question has finally been answered. Back in 2015, the consensus was that HDF5 is "so complicated that there is only one implementation" and too difficult for pure Go. I'm happy

Re: [go-nuts] Re: Scientific file formats: HDF5,FITS, NetCDF?

2025-10-30 Thread a.ko...@gmail.com
Andrey Kolkov P.S. NetCDF4 being "stripped down HDF5" (as mentioned in the original thread) means this library could potentially support it too, though that's not implemented yet. On Friday, 31 October 2025 at 06:16:14 UTC+3 [email protected] wrote: > > Subject: Pure Go H

[go-nuts] Re: Scientific file formats: HDF5,FITS, NetCDF? Pure Go HDF5 implementation - 9 years later

2025-10-30 Thread a.ko...@gmail.com
Hi all, Replying to this 9-year-old thread because the original question has finally been answered. Back in 2015, the consensus was that HDF5 is "so complicated that there is only one implementation" and too difficult for pure Go. I'm happy to report that's no longer true. WHAT EXISTS NOW (2

Re: [go-nuts] RegEx/string performance benchmarks

2025-11-29 Thread a.ko...@gmail.com
Hi all, I know this thread is 10+ years old, but I wanted to follow up since the regexp performance discussion is still highly relevant today. TL;DR: The situation has improved slightly over the years, but the fundamental performance characteristics haven't changed dramatically. So I built corege

Re: [go-nuts] RegEx/string performance benchmarks

2025-11-29 Thread a.ko...@gmail.com
Hi all, I know this thread is 10+ years old, but I wanted to follow up since the regexp performance discussion is still highly relevant today. TL;DR: The situation has improved slightly over the years, but the fundamental performance characteristics haven't changed dramatically. So I built corege

[go-nuts] Re: Race detection with CGO_ENABLED=0?

2025-11-28 Thread a.ko...@gmail.com
2025 update: This is now possible. I've built a Pure-Go race detector that works with CGO_ENABLED=0: https://github.com/kolkov/racedetector Works in: - Alpine/scratch Docker containers - AWS Lambda / Cloud Functions - Cross-compilation scenarios - Any CGO_ENABLED=0 environment

Re: [go-nuts] RegEx/string performance benchmarks

2025-11-30 Thread a.ko...@gmail.com
Thanks! ) On Sunday, 30 November 2025 at 10:00:27 UTC+3 Robert Engels wrote: > Very cool. > > On Nov 30, 2025, at 12:19 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I know this thread is 10+ years old, but I wanted to follow up since > the regexp performa