[ ] is nice. Nim also uses [ ] for generics. --Kent
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 4:41 PM Denis Cheremisov
wrote:
> Lesser and greater signs never were a good choice. They were chosen
> because of C syntax restrictions. Go creators would do *slice[T]* (or may
> be just *[T]*), *map[K,V]*,* chan[T]*, e
Operator overloading will never -- hopefully -- be implemented. It's a
perfect way to obscurate code. --Kent
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 4:33 PM Patrick Smith wrote:
> I like the second draft for generics. It seems to me a large
> simplification and improvement over the first draft. Considering just
I tested fyne on my Mac, hey didn't crash, that's a big plus with these
cross-platform GUI frameworks. The Look&Feel is somewhat different but with
some tweaks it could be made manageable. But for any large text-based
application with text styling and so forth I would use Electron or a
similar bro
I'm very dumb, but if you don't want to use generics or think they are bad
for the language, why can't you just ignore them and not use them?
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 7:07 AM Space A. wrote:
> Since pro-generics ppl here are struggling to provide any evidence of
> existence of open and public dis
>> it into the api as a “replacement” for the non type safe interface based
>> ones.
>>
>> On Mar 18, 2021, at 11:20 AM, Kent Sandvik wrote:
>>
>>
>> I'm very dumb, but if you don't want to use generics or think they are
>> bad for the languag
