The genome of the New Zealand 'lizard', the tuatara[1], has just been
sequenced and published in Nature[2,3].
The analysis of the genome included an examination of the repetitive
sequences within the genome. The engine for finding novel repeats for
this analysis is written in Go.
Gophers analyse
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, August 6, 2020 9:16 AM, 'Dan Kortschak' via golang-nuts
wrote:
> The genome of the New Zealand 'lizard', the tuatara[1], has just been
> sequenced and published in Nature[2,3].
>
> The analysis of the genome included an examination of the repetitive
On Thu, 2020-08-06 at 07:41 +, Sebastien Binet wrote:
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Thursday, August 6, 2020 9:16 AM, 'Dan Kortschak' via golang-nuts
> wrote:
>
> > The genome of the New Zealand 'lizard', the tuatara[1], has just
> > been
> > sequenced and published in Nature[2,3].
Reading is possible with IP_RECVTOS on Linux but requires the use of
recvmsg, because the TOS field is provided as ancillary data. This wouldn't
be very portable though. Raw sockets with IP_HDRINCL are a better option if
portability is a concern.
On Wednesday, August 5, 2020 at 11:33:41 PM UTC+
JMTCW: I think using square brackets [...] instead of parenthesis (...) is
a good decision.
And as someone whose programming experience has not been in C++ or Java, I
always found angle brackets for generics to be rather confusing but do not
find square brackets as confusing.
So in my mind,
Hi Russ,
In general, I think the proposal is a really good one. I like that you
abandoned contracts as interfaces were just too similar, and personally I
like the choice of square brackets.
There are a few aspects I do not like — 1.) no zero value and 2.) lack of
covariance and contravariance
Recently I was trying to understand how asynchronous preemption is
implemented in Go 1.14 and
basically figured out the call chain.
sysmon
↓
retake
↓
preemptone
↓
preemptM
↓
signalM(mp, sigPreempt)//send SIGURG to mp
↓
doSigPreempt(signal handler)
Hello Michele
This won't print in the array format rather it would print it in other way.
stringArray := []string{"Hello", "world", "!"}
fmt.Printf("[%s]", strings.Join(stringArray , ","))
Output [Hello,world,!]
On Thursday, October 10, 2019 at 10:41:59 PM UTC+5:30, Michele Caci wrote:
One option is to use json.Marshal or json.Encoder.Encode
fmt.Printf("%q", []string{"Hello", "world", "!") would quote the separate
strings and put the square brackets, but doesn't comma separate the items.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 9:24 AM wrote:
> Hello Michele
>
> This won't print in the array
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 10:02 AM Uli Kunitz wrote:
> Reading is possible with IP_RECVTOS on Linux but requires the use of
> recvmsg, because the TOS field is provided as ancillary data. This wouldn't
> be very portable though. Raw sockets with IP_HDRINCL are a better option if
> portability is a c
Hi gophers,
We have just released Go 1.14.7 and Go 1.13.15 to address a recently
reported security issue. We recommend that all users update to one of these
releases (if you’re not sure which, choose Go 1.14.7).
- encoding/binary: ReadUvarint and ReadVarint can read an unlimited
number of b
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 7:49 AM HailangGe wrote:
>
> Recently I was trying to understand how asynchronous preemption is
> implemented in Go 1.14 and
> basically figured out the call chain.
>
> sysmon
> ↓
> retake
> ↓
> preemptone
> ↓
> preemptM
> ↓
> signalM(mp,
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 8:52 PM Robert Engels wrote:
>
> I understand your point, but I think a few minor corrections Make a
> difference - it does not matter that String supports + and not - , a string
> would not be a Number. String concatenation is not addition.
My point wasn't that a string
We’ll probably agree to disagree there. Java has a lot of generic code written
and it’s never been a problem (using methods). Rarely can you write code that
treats + the same no matter if passed a string or numeric.
Even operators like < with strings don’t really make a lot of sense because
di
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 8:53 PM Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> My point wasn't that a string is a number. My point was that the
> current design draft permits writing a function that uses + and works
> with both strings and numbers.
Is there a need for that? I can't really imagine one.
That being s
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 12:10 PM Robert Engels wrote:
>
> We’ll probably agree to disagree there. Java has a lot of generic code
> written and it’s never been a problem (using methods). Rarely can you write
> code that treats + the same no matter if passed a string or numeric.
>
> Even operators
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 12:11 PM Axel Wagner
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 8:53 PM Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>
>> My point wasn't that a string is a number. My point was that the
>> current design draft permits writing a function that uses + and works
>> with both strings and numbers.
>
>
> Is
Have the authors considered the implications of requiring the `type`
keyword to use a generic type, not just at declaration time? Would this
open up more syntax possibilities, such as `var x T`? This might
be easier to read at the expense of five more characters of typing. It also
could unify
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 12:25 PM 'Red Daly' via golang-nuts
wrote:
>
> Have the authors considered the implications of requiring the `type` keyword
> to use a generic type, not just at declaration time? Would this open up more
> syntax possibilities, such as `var x T`? This might be easier to
>
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 9:26 PM 'Red Daly' via golang-nuts <
golang-nuts@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Have the authors considered the implications of requiring the `type`
> keyword to use a generic type, not just at declaration time? Would this
> open up more syntax possibilities, such as `var x T`?
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 1:17 PM Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 12:10 PM Robert Engels wrote:
> >
> > We’ll probably agree to disagree there. Java has a lot of generic code
> > written and it’s never been a problem (using methods). Rarely can you write
> > code that treats + t
Dear Netters:
This is my first release of the "godbi" package. You feedback is greatly
appreciated.
URL: https://github.com/genelet/godbi
Thanks.
Here are the first few sentences in README
*godbi* adds a set of high-level functions to the generic SQL handle in GO,
for easier database execu
Hi,
I'm quite happy about the generics so far, but now I'm trying some ideas
that I don't know if they are possible or not given the current proposal.
My idea, is to create some kind of generic handler for "net/http" that
could be used in a whole project.
It would allow same behavior on each rou
Hello,
having fun with generics I stumbled upon this failure:
https://go2goplay.golang.org/p/Dc3tWrd6RzQ
Bryan C. Mills helped me to fix it by forcing the type at the call point.
(the comment in the code)
Forcing a type on a var you just declared is a little bit troublesome in
this case, but i
I completely forgot about this thread. I wanted to thank you all for your
insights.
I've learned quite a few things, and can add many things to my "to dig"
list!
Le vendredi 3 janvier 2020 23:31:52 UTC+1, Dolanor Maergal a écrit :
>
> Hi all and Happy New Year,
>
> I was daydreaming the other da
Hi All,
I want to know how the slice or map grow.
Do we have an method to debug the func of makeSlice Or the map
creating or growing process step by step?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this gr
I read somewhere (Very sorry I couldn't get the link now) that golang uses
libc to implement syscalls when the code is built in c-shared mode. I want
to check if this true.
I was using a go c-shared library as a plugin in my C code, and I wanted to
interpose some of the syscalls. If go really
Here in the example below:
package main
import (
"C"
"fmt"
)
//export test
func test() {
fmt.Println("test code")
}
func main() {
}
The above package was built using -builtmode=c-shared. I wanted to load the
built library in my C code, and interpose the esported function 't
Hi,
I know from README that gollvm does not support race detector. Is there any
technical problem? Is it possible to use ThreadSanitizer in LLVM to
implement a workaround race detector in gollvm?
Thanks.
Ting
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang
Am 07.08.20 um 05:00 schrieb emeg...@gmail.com:
//export test
func test() {
fmt.Println("test code")
}
`test` is not exported. It would be, if it was called `Test` with a
capital `T`.
Lutz
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group
30 matches
Mail list logo
