I wanted to make a quick observation w/r/t Ian's suggestion of not
registering ambiguous patterns. The tradeoff isn't ultimately about what
behaviors can be associated with what routes, but around what is required
to register routes. To intentionally use the kinds of routes we'd interpret
as am
On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 2:23 PM 'Jonathan Amsterdam' via golang-nuts
wrote:
>
> The second question is about a specific routing scheme, and here I have no
> preconceived notions. Here is the context: given two routing patterns that
> might otherwise conflict, we'd like to allow both by preferring
