Re: [go-nuts] Re: Go 1.14.1 and Go 1.13.9 are released

2020-03-19 Thread Manlio Perillo
The problem is that I have seen using golang in the wrong context, as an example: https://www.gophercon.co.uk/videos/2017/golangs-realtime-gc-in-theory-and-practice/ https://www.gophercon.co.uk/videos/2019/Experimenting-with-Golang-and-Webassembly/ I suspect that new programmers starting to use G

Re: [go-nuts] Re: Go 1.14.1 and Go 1.13.9 are released

2020-03-19 Thread Dmitri Shuralyov
To add to what Ian said, I've edited the issue titles now, which makes them slightly shorter and easier to read. Also see https://golang.org/doc/faq#go_or_golang. While the language is called "Go", the term "golang" still comes up occasionally in some contexts. On Thursday, March 19, 2020 at 5

Re: [go-nuts] Re: Go 1.14.1 and Go 1.13.9 are released

2020-03-19 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 1:58 PM Manlio Perillo wrote: > > Thanks for the release. > > However I'm a bit sad that even the Go team is starting to use "golang" > instead of "go": > https://github.com/golang/go/issues/37613 > golang 1.14.rc1 3-5% performance regression from golang 1.13 during protob