I didn't found the attachment here. Can you put it somewhere. Maybe as
github gist?
On Monday, May 9, 2022 at 4:18:52 AM UTC+2 garenchan wrote:
> /proc//limits of the two processes are the same.
> But /proc//smaps of the two processes are quite different, I have
> uploaded them to the attachme
/proc//limits of the two processes are the same.
But /proc//smaps of the two processes are quite different, I have
uploaded them to the attachment.
在2022年5月8日星期日 UTC+8 16:08:50 写道：
> I cannot say what the difference is, but I would do two things to solve
> the mystery:
>
> 1) Compare /proc//li
I cannot say what the difference is, but I would do two things to solve the
mystery:
1) Compare /proc//limits for differences.
2) Compare the output of egrep '^Rss:|^[0-9a-f]' /proc//smaps for the
processes on the different machines.
Report the results and share the outputs.
On Friday, May 6,
https://www.arp242.net/static-go.html
> On May 5, 2022, at 11:27 PM, garenchan wrote:
>
> The binary file is not a dynamic executable. So I don't think that will
> happen.
>
> 在2022年5月6日星期五 UTC+8 11:54:44 写道：
>> Are you certain that on the low memory instance there isn’t another process
>>
The binary file is not a dynamic executable. So I don't think that will
happen.
在2022年5月6日星期五 UTC+8 11:54:44 写道：
> Are you certain that on the low memory instance there isn’t another
> process - maybe Go - that hasn’t already loaded the shared libraries - and
> on the other it hasn’t - so th
Are you certain that on the low memory instance there isn’t another process -
maybe Go - that hasn’t already loaded the shared libraries - and on the other
it hasn’t - so the RSS is different. Compare the VSZ sizes and see if they are
the same.
> On May 5, 2022, at 10:28 PM, garenchan wrote:
