Thanks! That clears it up.
On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 7:52:58 AM UTC-7, Axel Wagner wrote:
>
> Yes, that would be the correct approach. And yes, the fork wouldn't be
> go-gettable, but it isn't supposed to be long-lived or go-got anyway; it's
> a fork to do a pull-request.
> If you want to do
Yes, that would be the correct approach. And yes, the fork wouldn't be
go-gettable, but it isn't supposed to be long-lived or go-got anyway; it's
a fork to do a pull-request.
If you want to do an actual fork (not what github calls a fork, but what
the open source community calls a fork), you are cr
