Re: [go-nuts] Makefiles for Go Programs

Hello, A big thank you to everybody who contributed to this thread! I guess it will take some time to process the things learned from this discussion. BR, Roland Am Mi., 25. Aug. 2021 um 12:28 Uhr schrieb Stephen Illingworth < stephen.illingwo...@gmail.com>: > I use Makefiles with Go projects.

Re: [go-nuts] Makefiles for Go Programs

I use Makefiles with Go projects. For many of the reasons already given but it's especially useful for me for cross compilation to the target platforms at release time. So, when running "make release" I have "test" and "generate" targets as dependencies to make sure I've not missed anything. I

Re: [go-nuts] Makefiles for Go Programs

Dnia 2021-08-24, o godz. 07:54:35 Reto napisał(a): > It may be nicer, however the beauty of make is that it is ubiquitous, > everybody already has it. No, not everybody has it. Esp. on Windows host. > With mage, your installation instructions now need to contain how / > where to get mage in the

Re: [go-nuts] Makefiles for Go Programs

On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 06:12:43PM -0700, Michael Ellis wrote: > Three cheers for mage . It's more verbose than make > but it's pure Go. I use it to build and test projects that include > generated html/css/js supported by a Web Assembly clients communicating > with a ser

Re: [go-nuts] Makefiles for Go Programs

Three cheers for mage . It's more verbose than make but it's pure Go. I use it to build and test projects that include generated html/css/js supported by a Web Assembly clients communicating with a server. On Monday, August 23, 2021 at 7:33:10 PM UTC-4 Connor Kuehl wrote

Re: [go-nuts] Makefiles for Go Programs

> On Aug 22, 2021, at 10:11 PM, jlfo...@berkeley.edu > wrote: > > > I've noticed that few, if any, Go programs use Makefiles. Is that because the > overhead of using make is greater than the overhead of just always compiling > and linking everything? > One piece of evidence for this is tha

Re: [go-nuts] Makefiles for Go Programs

> On 23 Aug 2021, at 05:11, jlfo...@berkeley.edu wrote: > >  > I've noticed that few, if any, Go programs use Makefiles. Is that because the > overhead of using make is greater than the of just always compiling and > linking everything? Most likely, it’s because go comes with it’s own buil

Re: [go-nuts] Makefiles for Go Programs

On Aug 22, 2021, at 23:11, jlfo...@berkeley.edu wrote: > >  > I've noticed that few, if any, Go programs use Makefiles. Is that because the > overhead of using make is greater than the overhead of just always compiling > and linking everything? > One piece of evidence for this is that the Go c

Re: [go-nuts] Makefiles for Go Programs

On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 8:11 PM jlfo...@berkeley.edu wrote: > I've noticed that few, if any, Go programs use Makefiles. Is that because > the overhead of using make is greater than the overhead of just always > compiling and linking everything? > One piece of evidence for this is that the Go comp