Ok. Thanks. I’ll play around with it a bit more. If it doesn't work out,
there’s always C code!
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 2:03 AM Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 6:50 PM Anthony Adams
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks again. That’s very helpful. It sounds like ARMv5 is still
> supported.
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 6:50 PM Anthony Adams
wrote:
>
> Thanks again. That’s very helpful. It sounds like ARMv5 is still supported.
> Now I just need to confirm the minimum kernel version. The system I’m using
> has a 2.6.39.4 kernel, which I’m unable to upgrade. This document says the
> minim
Thanks again. That’s very helpful. It sounds like ARMv5 is still supported.
Now I just need to confirm the minimum kernel version. The system I’m using
has a 2.6.39.4 kernel, which I’m unable to upgrade. This document says the
minimum kernel version for ARM is v3.1, but I assume this is for the lat
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 1:32 PM wrote:
>
> Thanks for the reply, Ian. I’ve seen the page you referenced, but the 1.8
> release notes say that it will be the last version to support ARMv5. I’ve
> also come across some posts that mention certain minimum Linux kernel
> requirements, but nothing th
Thanks for the reply, Ian. I’ve seen the page you referenced, but the 1.8
release notes say that it will be the last version to support ARMv5. I’ve also
come across some posts that mention certain minimum Linux kernel requirements,
but nothing that lists them by Golang version.
--
You received
Yes, I use Go on ARMv5. AFAIK it still works.
On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 12:51 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 10:17 AM wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone know where I can find a list of Go versions that
> > includes the architectures supported and minimum kernel version
> > requirem
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 10:17 AM wrote:
>
> Does anyone know where I can find a list of Go versions that includes the
> architectures supported and minimum kernel version requirements. I’d like to
> use Go on an ARM926EJ processor (ARMv5tejl), running a 2.6.39.4 Linux kernel.
> It looks like th
