On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 5:33 AM Pete Wilson
wrote:
> And then the quality of software will improve, because not everybody can
afford a few billion
Depends on how you define quality. Catch: bug-free is not a usable
definition of software quality. At least while humans write and test it.
--
-j
All this is true.
But I expect that one of these fine days, someone sueable is going to ship
software with a serious bug, and are going to get sued and lose because
(i) there’s a lot of money
and
(ii) it’s well known in the art that doing X is just bloody stupid, and you did
X.
And then the qua
