I wasn't speaking metaphorically.
-rob
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 8:45 AM, roger peppe wrote:
> Hang by your pseudopod, write if you find a warm rich planet ripe for
> conquest.
>
> On 8 August 2017 at 22:49, Rob Pike wrote:
> > Grep for conquest.
> >
> > -rob
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 6
Hang by your pseudopod, write if you find a warm rich planet ripe for conquest.
On 8 August 2017 at 22:49, Rob Pike wrote:
> Grep for conquest.
>
> -rob
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 6:58 AM, roger peppe wrote:
>> On 8 August 2017 at 21:34, Michael Jones wrote:
>>> The Four Horsemen of the Apoca
Grep for conquest.
-rob
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 6:58 AM, roger peppe wrote:
> On 8 August 2017 at 21:34, Michael Jones wrote:
>> The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, surely! It would be tempting fate to
>> shade them or step on their brand.
>
> Ah, but of which apocalypse?
>
> --
> You received
On 8 August 2017 at 21:34, Michael Jones wrote:
> The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, surely! It would be tempting fate to
> shade them or step on their brand.
Ah, but of which apocalypse?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To uns
The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, surely! It would be tempting fate to
shade them or step on their brand.
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 5:54 AM, wrote:
> Thanks for suggesting the Reader(q0, q1 int64) io.RuneReader. I
> accidentally replied off list.
>
> I wasn't aware of up to four horsemen being i
Thanks for suggesting the Reader(q0, q1 int64) io.RuneReader. I accidentally
replied off list.
I wasn't aware of up to four horsemen being involved. The man pages didn't
prepare me for this.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To
On 8 August 2017 at 12:04, Rob Pike wrote:
> When I wrote that (1985?), I was misinformed about the Four Horsemen.
Which particular Four Horsemen would those be?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
When I wrote that (1985?), I was misinformed about the Four Horsemen.
Also now "u-" is redo.
-rob
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 8:59 PM, roger peppe wrote:
> It's nice to see this, but it would be nicer still if it
> was amenable to representations that weren't
> just a slice of bytes (for example dis
It's nice to see this, but it would be nicer still if it
was amenable to representations that weren't
just a slice of bytes (for example disk or network
backed files, or just something which made insertions
not O(n)). It seems like it might be possible
to use Regexp.FindReader* to avoid duplicating
