I’m sorry, but I don’t think your reasoning is correct. See the code below.
Less lines, and better functionality & design, and you can do this today…
(trivial to also add the ComplexPrice)
Although I think you should be able to write:
ip := Prices{1,2,3}
and the compiler could figure out that
On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 15:31:41 -0500
robert engels wrote:
> You would probably have simpler code just define an interface Value(), and
> a ComplexValue() and two methods…
...and implement it on any single type I wanna sum? No, thanks. I am doing it
already in Go1 :)
> But even then, you need my pr
I would argue that is not generics code - the fact that you are type checking
in the implementation is a problem, and replicating the logic for “each type”.
You would probably have simpler code just define an interface Value(), and a
ComplexValue() and two methods… But even then, you need my pro
