Wouldn't this be more a job for 'eg' instead?
sent from my droid
On Jan 23, 2018 2:03 PM, "Chris Hopkins" wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm tidying up some code and I think this would be a great use for gofmt's
> rewrite capabilities, but I can't make it work. I have some code where
> error checking is missin
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 2:03 PM Chris Hopkins wrote:
> gofmt -w -r 'a.Set(b,c) -> err:=a.Set(b,c)\nif err != nil{log.Fatal("Set
Error",err)}'
I think the -r flag can handle only forms like 'expr1 -> expr2', but in
this case expr2 is a statement. To my surprise I cannot find the flag
documented a
Hi,
I'm tidying up some code and I think this would be a great use for gofmt's
rewrite capabilities, but I can't make it work. I have some code where
error checking is missing.
In the code every instance of Set returns an error value that is not
checked, so I assumed I could write:
gofmt -w -r
