Re: [go-nuts] dep: Roadmap for merging into the toolchain

I should clarify one thing: there are two open issues regarding the ·semantics· of the files: how the default versions are parsed re: the caret[0], and how OS/arch/build tags are parameterized[1]. Until these issues are closed, dep may change its interpretation of the files. If you're interested in

Re: [go-nuts] dep: Roadmap for merging into the toolchain

And an update: thanks to the excellent work of contributor Carolyn Van Slyck, we have the manifest and lock file format changes complete and merged[0] to dep. From this point forward the file formats should be stable enough to start committing. So, as Russ originally noted: please do give it a try!

Re: [go-nuts] dep: Roadmap for merging into the toolchain

The dep project is in an alpha state; we'll leave alpha and enter a versioned releases phase as soon as the manifest/lock file format changes are in. On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 2:32 AM, Kiyoshi Murata wrote: > I think Russ' feedback may imply dep needing to be versioned, as in the > project itself p

Re: [go-nuts] dep: Roadmap for merging into the toolchain

I think Russ' feedback may imply dep needing to be versioned, as in the project itself publishing releases. Specially considering Peter Bourgon's lastest response, there's no way of users to know if dep is usable yet or not (roadmap is too abstract in that regard), and after that, what features

Re: [go-nuts] dep: Roadmap for merging into the toolchain

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 3:14 AM, Russ Cox wrote: > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Russ Cox wrote: >> >> By far the most important things to do with dep right now are (1) build >> something people can use and get benefit from today and eliminate blockers >> to adoption and (2) based on experienc

Re: [go-nuts] dep: Roadmap for merging into the toolchain

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Russ Cox wrote: > By far the most important things to do with dep right now are (1) build > something people can use and get benefit from today and eliminate blockers > to adoption and (2) based on experience with that usage, learn what the > eventual design and g

Re: [go-nuts] dep: Roadmap for merging into the toolchain

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:15 PM Sam Boyer wrote: > I'm don't think that's an accurate summary, at all. The proof is easy ;-) -- -j -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails fro

Re: [go-nuts] dep: Roadmap for merging into the toolchain

I'm don't think that's an accurate summary, at all. On Tuesday, March 14, 2017 at 3:22:22 AM UTC-4, Jan Mercl wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 8:01 AM Konstantin Khomoutov < > flat...@users.sourceforge.net > wrote: > > > Please don't miss the monumental heaps of discussions about package > manag

Re: [go-nuts] dep: Roadmap for merging into the toolchain

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 8:01 AM Konstantin Khomoutov < flatw...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Please don't miss the monumental heaps of discussions about package management in Go [1]. Executive summary: Solving the Go's package dependency resolution problem can be either automatic or correct. P

Re: [go-nuts] dep: Roadmap for merging into the toolchain

On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 23:22:54 -0700 (PDT) Albert Tedja wrote: > I was using godeps before and now govendor, and never felt 100% happy > with either one. I have some feedback of how I think the package > management tool should work from the developer perspective, and here > some features that I th

Re: [go-nuts] dep: Roadmap for merging into the toolchain

I was using godeps before and now govendor, and never felt 100% happy with either one. I have some feedback of how I think the package management tool should work from the developer perspective, and here some features that I think is crucial. 1. Standardize the package file. With govendor, t

Re: [go-nuts] dep: Roadmap for merging into the toolchain

Hi Russ - thanks, this is great. I think all of this will be much easier with these discussions happening in the open. On Monday, March 13, 2017 at 5:09:19 PM UTC-4, Russ Cox wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 6:47 AM, Sam Boyer > wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> Since we opened up the dep project

Re: [go-nuts] dep: Roadmap for merging into the toolchain

On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 6:47 AM, Sam Boyer wrote: > Hi folks, > > Since we opened up the dep project in > late January, there's been flurry of contributions, which has been great. > However, the plans and end goal of dep haven't been entirely clear to > everyone. >

[go-nuts] dep: Roadmap for merging into the toolchain

Hi folks, Since we opened up the dep project in late January, there's been flurry of contributions, which has been great. However, the plans and end goal of dep haven't been entirely clear to everyone. To address that, and help guide contributors, we've put out