Re: [go-nuts] Re: golang-codereview - purpose

2017-07-22 Thread Sam Whited
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017, at 20:59, Ulderico Cirello wrote: > Just confirming, you read all of it? I do not read every single comment and try-bot-starting message on every single CL, but I at least look at what CLs are being proposed. So I more or less read the first message in every thread. —Sam --

Re: [go-nuts] Re: golang-codereview - purpose

2017-07-22 Thread Dave Cheney
yup On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Ulderico Cirello wrote: > Just confirming, you read all of it? > > Il giorno sab 22 lug 2017 alle ore 18:17 Dave Cheney ha > scritto: >> >> I read it. It lets me know which changes have been proposed. >> >> >> On Sunday, 23 July 2017 09:42:57 UTC+10, Carlos

Re: [go-nuts] Re: golang-codereview - purpose

2017-07-22 Thread Ulderico Cirello
Just confirming, you read all of it? Il giorno sab 22 lug 2017 alle ore 18:17 Dave Cheney ha scritto: > I read it. It lets me know which changes have been proposed. > > > On Sunday, 23 July 2017 09:42:57 UTC+10, Carlos wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> I have subscribed golang-codereview list for a whil

[go-nuts] Re: golang-codereview - purpose

2017-07-22 Thread Dave Cheney
I read it. It lets me know which changes have been proposed. On Sunday, 23 July 2017 09:42:57 UTC+10, Carlos wrote: > > Hi, > > > I have subscribed golang-codereview list for a while. Even filtering out > for keywords, it is still a lot of emails. I'd assume that such list would > have a good re