I think it is no different from regular "if err != nil {}" handling, sorry
My thought behind ? is to make is working for a simple cases. If you are
doing an error translation/transform/wrapping - this is a case that I feel
is better handled by existing explicit "if err != nil" construct.
A.
On
f := file.Open() ? error {
//f is nill
return erors.Wrap("nop",err)
}
defer f.Close()
On Saturday, June 29, 2019 at 11:56:09 PM UTC+2, Andrey Tcherepanov wrote:
>
> Hello mighty fighters of errors!
>
> Here comes my half-thought idea of another way to express error handling:
>
> *Add a postfix '?'
