On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Aaron Wood wrote:
>
> There must be other rare, obscure ways to exploit
> overflows in code generated from Go, no?
I sure hope not. If there are any, they are bugs that should be fixed.
Ian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Interesting, thanks for the info Ian. Other than the OS and distro
requirements, is there any real benefit from generating PIE binaries with
Go? There must be some vector that it protects again, even though most
things are already bounds-checked. The only situation I can think of is if
you're c
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Aaron Wood wrote:
>
> This is a rather old comment of yours but I was curious about a few things
> you said. I agree that Go does take care of a lot of these problems (and
> most other high-level languages try to too) so I'm curious as to why Go has
> exposed a bui
Hi Russ,
This is a rather old comment of yours but I was curious about a few things
you said. I agree that Go does take care of a lot of these problems (and
most other high-level languages try to too) so I'm curious as to why Go has
exposed a build option for generating position independent exe
