Yes, it should be contracts.Ordered to justify the use of the '<' operator.
The proposed new built-in comparable contract will only permit one to use
'==' or '!='.
I agree that the revised design is very good, contracts are now far more
intelligible than they were and the whole thing just feel
https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/master/design/go2draft-contracts.md
(Updated on 7/25/2019)
GopherCon 2019 Talk
summary: https://about.sourcegraph.com/go/gophercon-2019-generics-in-go
Jon
On Sunday, July 28, 2019 at 7:55:50 PM UTC-4, Mandolyte wrote:
>
> I missed this. Do you have a link
