Re: [go-nuts] Re: Google Grumpy (Python->Go)

On Saturday 18. February 2017 23.45.13 Dylan Trotter wrote: > Interesting. Thanks for the perspective. I did take a look at the PyPy ast > module but I guess I got scared off by the PyPy specific requriements. > > I ended up integrating pythonparser > which

Re: [go-nuts] Re: Google Grumpy (Python->Go)

Interesting. Thanks for the perspective. I did take a look at the PyPy ast module but I guess I got scared off by the PyPy specific requriements. I ended up integrating pythonparser which is a pure Python parser for Python 2.x and 3.x. I'm very impressed wi

Re: [go-nuts] Re: Google Grumpy (Python->Go)

On Saturday, February 4, 2017 at 5:35:33 AM UTC+1, Dylan Trotter wrote: > > The compiler cannot yet run under Grumpy because it uses standard > libraries that aren't yet supported. The most substantial unsupported > library is the ast module. Once https://github.com/google/grumpy/pull/216 > is m

Re: [go-nuts] Re: Google Grumpy (Python->Go)

cool, i'll keep an eye on that. On Saturday, 4 February 2017 04:35:43 UTC, Dylan Trotter wrote: > > The compiler cannot yet run under Grumpy because it uses standard > libraries that aren't yet supported. The most substantial unsupported > library is the ast module. Once https://github.com/googl

Re: [go-nuts] Re: Google Grumpy (Python->Go)

The compiler cannot yet run under Grumpy because it uses standard libraries that aren't yet supported. The most substantial unsupported library is the ast module. Once https://github.com/google/grumpy/pull/216 is merged, I think we'll be very close to hosting the compiler in Grumpy. At that point,

[go-nuts] Re: Google Grumpy (Python->Go)

just been taking a look, and wondered why i couldn't "go get" it, then i see the compiler is in python. which leads to the question; has anyone attempted to compile the compiler to go? On Wednesday, 4 January 2017 19:27:10 UTC, Shawn Milochik wrote: > > I'm surprised this hasn't hit this list