The first (alpha) version of Gcc Go for AIX 7.1 is available on
BullFreeware:
http://bullfreeware.com/affichage.php?id=3614
It is an experimental version. That means that still several Go compiler
and Go libgo tests are still failing and only 32 bit version has been
built/tested in depth fo
Hi,
We are making progress with GCC Go on AIX 6.1, with GCC 7 snapshot.
Current issues are:
- '$' character in assembler symbols. Replacing '$' by '_' is not a
complete solution yet. Requires more study.
- go command failure, due to: 'FFI Go closure' not being implemented on
AIX yet.
- still
Good to hear. I wasn't able to get very far with latest gcc on AIX 5.3.
Since you have made good progress on AIX 6.1, I will not waste any more
time on 5.3. That being said, I will try to bootstrap Go library to the
latest.
On Monday, 19 December 2016 08:10:56 UTC-8, matthieu.sar...@atos.net wr
I am also working on an AIX port, from another version (GCC 7 on AIX 6.1).
For now, I have been able to complete the build, but lots of tests are
failing. Some of the changes I made require to be reworked, as I did them
just to allow the build to progress, to have an idea about the amount of
ch
Great news! I'm in need for that!
Can you share it somehow?
scchang ezt írta (időpont: 2016. dec. 16., P 6:42):
> Not sure if ppl in this thread are still interested. I managed to get
> gccgo (included in gcc 4.8.4) to work on AIX 5.3. The bulk of the changes
> are indeed in the xcoff reader as
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 9:42 PM, scchang wrote:
> Not sure if ppl in this thread are still interested. I managed to get gccgo
> (included in gcc 4.8.4) to work on AIX 5.3. The bulk of the changes are
> indeed in the xcoff reader as Ian and others had suggested. xcoff writer
> also has a couple of
Not sure if ppl in this thread are still interested. I managed to get gccgo
(included in gcc 4.8.4) to work on AIX 5.3. The bulk of the changes are
indeed in the xcoff reader as Ian and others had suggested. xcoff writer
also has a couple of issues as the default assembler could not understand