[go-nuts] Re: Go modules for non go repository

2020-05-30 Thread evertonjk
go mod why* & tidy On Saturday, May 30, 2020 at 9:02:54 AM UTC-7, John Krzemien wrote: > > This solution has been working well and we still use it. The go mod & tidy > tools not working hasn't really been an issue. > > On Friday, May 29, 2020 at 9:27:25 AM UTC-7, cjcja...@gmail.com wrote: >> >>

[go-nuts] Re: Go modules for non go repository

2020-05-30 Thread evertonjk
This solution has been working well and we still use it. The go mod & tidy tools not working hasn't really been an issue. On Friday, May 29, 2020 at 9:27:25 AM UTC-7, cjcja...@gmail.com wrote: > > I'm interested in this idea for a similar situation we're in. > > - What version of Go were you usi

[go-nuts] Re: Go modules for non go repository

2020-05-29 Thread cjcjame...@gmail.com
I'm interested in this idea for a similar situation we're in. - What version of Go were you using? - Has you strategy been working reasonably well for the past 5+ months? - When does `go mod tidy` or `go mod why` come up for you, and is it a significant blocker? Thanks! C.J. Jameson On Friday,

[go-nuts] Re: Go modules for non go repository

2019-12-20 Thread evertonjk
To clarify, the `// +build tools` should make the compiler skip building this file because the "tools" constraint will never be met, but allows go modules to add it to the dependency list. It just looks like go mod tidy doesn't like non go repositories. On Thursday, December 19, 2019 at 10:42:5