Re: [go-nuts] Re: Go 1.12.1 and Go 1.11.6 are released

I don't have direct feedback on this, but I do have an observation based on my own faster-sort code, which is that timing seems about the same, and scaling seems different than this report. The sorty_test.go file starts with "const N = 1 << 28" so we're talking about sorting a 268,435,456-element

Re: [go-nuts] Re: Go 1.12.1 and Go 1.11.6 are released

On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 1:46 PM Serhat Şevki Dinçer wrote: > > I see a regression on speed with sorty tests (go test -short -gcflags '-B -s' > -ldflags '-s -w') on my Intel Core i5-4210M laptop (also sortutil became > faster, zermelo float became much slower): Please open an issue with full det

[go-nuts] Re: Go 1.12.1 and Go 1.11.6 are released

Hi, I see a regression on speed with sorty tests (go test -short -gcflags '-B -s' -ldflags '-s -w') on my Intel Core i5-4210M laptop (also sortutil became faster, zermelo float became much slower): with *go 1.12.1* Sorting uint32 sortutil took 18.64s zermelo to

[go-nuts] Re: Go 1.12.1 and Go 1.11.6 are released

Thanks for the note! Was hoping `math/pi` package to have been added on this date! :) On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 2:16 PM Katie Hockman wrote: > Hello gophers, > > We have just released Go versions 1.12.1 and 1.11.6, minor point releases. > > These releases include fixes to cgo, the compiler, the go