Re: [go-nuts] Re: Go : Philosophy

I think pretty much of Python philosophy is transferrable to Go as the two languages seem to share a similar outlook. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email

Re: [go-nuts] Re: Go : Philosophy

"Effective Go" and "Go Tutorial" is not written for experts. It is a well thought out introduction helping beginners start out with Go. On Tuesday, 29 June 2010 10:05:48 UTC+2, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: > > On 6/28/10, Peter Bourgon > wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Mayuresh Kathe > > > w

[go-nuts] Re: Go : Philosophy

You might find Go Proverbs and the related video by Rob Pike interesting. On Monday, June 28, 2010 at 9:43:48 AM UTC-4, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: > > Like the UNIX philosophy (below); > Write programs that do one thing and do it well. > Write programs to

[go-nuts] Re: Go : Philosophy

One perception I have about Go philosophy: - Don't create futile abstractions; - Prefer not create abstractions if they will increase the quantity of code needed for the problem. Example of these are the missing generic type system. People from other schools of thought (eg: Java) tend to pref