Re: [go-nuts] Re: Glide for forks

2016-09-02 Thread mhhcbon
`glide update` or a install should do the job, yes. If that does not `mv vendor _vendor && glide install` to figure out if things works or are stinky. Do you mean you re in situation where you have one to many repo to update by doing a fork / PR / merge to actually make a significant change

Re: [go-nuts] Re: Glide for forks

2016-09-01 Thread Henrik Johansson
Can it work when the forked gh repo contains many packages that sometimes use each other? It feels weird to be masking the very repo I cloned to work in... Now I am using the approach outlined by Francesc Campoy in http://blog.campoy.cat/2014/03/github-and-go-forking-pull-requests-and.html Neat bu

Re: [go-nuts] Re: Glide for forks

2016-09-01 Thread Henrik Johansson
I did try it but perhaps I did something wrong. Is 'glide update' enough after such an addition? The cloned repo has a glide.yaml and lock file checked in so these would have to be kept local or otherwise skipped in pull requests I guess. On Thu, Sep 1, 2016, 23:43 mhhcbon wrote: > this helps ?

[go-nuts] Re: Glide for forks

2016-09-01 Thread mhhcbon
this helps ? https://github.com/Masterminds/glide/blob/a20b232c135529d4d73b5cf95f66954d34750ced/docs/example-glide.yaml#L30 Le jeudi 1 septembre 2016 22:15:27 UTC+2, Henrik Johansson a écrit : > > Hi, > > How does the aliasing support in Glide work. > There is a couple of hints in the Github read