On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 7:50 AM, john howitt wrote:
> One of my reasons for moving to Go was to escape from frameworks which in
> my opinion are a fashion statement not a technology. Slightly mangling the
> saying about Regular expressions "I have a problem learning Go", "OK use a
> framework", "
One of my reasons for moving to Go was to escape from frameworks which in
my opinion are a fashion statement not a technology. Slightly mangling the
saying about Regular expressions "I have a problem learning Go", "OK use a
framework", "Now i have two problems", "You can also use and ORM", "Ah n
Thanks for the tip! But he is a newcomer and so am I. Tell us can we learn
it. Is it documented anywhere. That's exactly what i told him.
I would love to try vecty. But right now we can't figure out how to try it.
14-09-2017 9:14 pm को "Jim Ancona" ने लिखा:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 1:28 AM, Vi
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 1:28 AM, Vikram Rawat
wrote:
>
> And there is another project called VECTY. But I mailed them and they told
> me it's not documented yet. and it could have bugs.
>
Vecty (https://github.com/gopherjs/vecty) uses Gopherjs and runs in the
browser, so it used for different thi
>
> I am trying to learn golang too. and I have never ever build a website.
> All the experience that I have is by building SHINY R dashboards.I tried
> almost all the framework. But I liked REVEL. Because speed and concurrency
> is not my concern I just want to write simple database web applic
Personally when I started my project I chose to use a framework. I think
it is ok to start with frameworks as long as you know what framework should
do, what key concepts should be handled when dealing with Web app. Maybe Go
provides all those solutions with standard pkgs, but if a framework can
g
Asked and answered many times in this group and in another popular Go forum:
https://forum.golangbridge.org/search?q=framework
Another collection of Go frameworks, tools, packages (libs) can be found in
the following GitHub repo:
https://github.com/avelino/awesome-go#web-frameworks
There are a
Maybe it is better nowadays but at least last time I tried a bigger
framework the first thing that happened was I had to either change logger
or wrestle with how the framework did it's logging.
I would from experience in both Go and other languages (mostly Java, Spring
is not your friend) very much
Actually, there is nothing in Go that prevents you from using any kind of
frameworks. You are free to use whatever you wish.
Go provides a more complete standard library for web development than many
other programming languages. While in other languages you have to rely on
frameworks, in Go, bu
I will simply point out that go seems to be alone in this regard. All other
languages that I know and have used have embraced the idea that it's OK to
assemble various functionalities in a useful framework which one can deploy
without too much effort.
On Monday, September 11, 2017 at 2:18:5
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Tim Uckun wrote:
>
> I understand the sentiment but I am really confused by this advice. Are
> you saying I should write everything myself? My own CSRF implementation, my
> own authentication scheme, my own rate limiter, my own jwt implementation,
> my own logger
On Monday, September 11, 2017 at 12:56:40 PM UTC+12, Florin Pățan wrote:
>
> Given your list of choices, I would go for Buffalo as it's probably the
> closest you can get to an idiomatic Go code base while not having magic in
> the code and still be able to understand what's happening when thin
Given your list of choices, I would go for Buffalo as it's probably the
closest you can get to an idiomatic Go code base while not having magic in
the code and still be able to understand what's happening when things go
wrong.
As others have recommended, also try writing your code without the u
13 matches
Mail list logo
