https://play.golang.org/p/Tr2PRKI23w,
>> but runs only on windows (kind of).
>>
>> *What have I done...*
>>
>> + Egon
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From: * on behalf of Egon >> >
>>> *Date: *Monday, July 18, 2016 at
gt;>
>> *From: * on behalf of Egon
>> *Date: *Monday, July 18, 2016 at 1:32 AM
>> *To: *golang-nuts
>> *Cc: *
>> *Subject: *[go-nuts] Re: An efficient runtime expression evaluation
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, 18 July 2016
Impressive AND aggressive. ;-)
From: on behalf of Egon
Date: Monday, July 18, 2016 at 9:07 AM
To: golang-nuts
Cc: ,
Subject: Re: [go-nuts] Re: An efficient runtime expression evaluation
On Monday, 18 July 2016 13:27:09 UTC+3, Michael Jones wrote:
Anything much faster than this needs
a little faster https://play.golang.org/p/Tr2PRKI23w,
but runs only on windows (kind of).
*What have I done...*
+ Egon
>
>
> *From: *> on behalf of Egon <
> egon...@gmail.com >
> *Date: *Monday, July 18, 2016 at 1:32 AM
> *To: *golang-nuts >
> *Cc: *>
> *S
: An efficient runtime expression evaluation
On Monday, 18 July 2016 11:13:08 UTC+3, Egon wrote:
On Monday, 18 July 2016 10:30:14 UTC+3, Egon wrote:
On Monday, 18 July 2016 03:11:29 UTC+3, ondrej...@gmail.com wrote:
Cheers, I tried replicating my endeavours
(https://play.golang.org/p
On Monday, 18 July 2016 11:13:08 UTC+3, Egon wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, 18 July 2016 10:30:14 UTC+3, Egon wrote:
>>
>> On Monday, 18 July 2016 03:11:29 UTC+3, ondrej...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> Cheers, I tried replicating my endeavours (
>>> https://play.golang.org/p/Qxoo2ASac6), sorry if it's sti
On Monday, 18 July 2016 10:30:14 UTC+3, Egon wrote:
>
> On Monday, 18 July 2016 03:11:29 UTC+3, ondrej...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Cheers, I tried replicating my endeavours (
>> https://play.golang.org/p/Qxoo2ASac6), sorry if it's still too verbose.
>> It's essentially rewriting the inbuilt ast.No
PS: you may want to research and learn how Forth interpreters are
implemented, they have similar problems.
On Monday, 18 July 2016 10:30:14 UTC+3, Egon wrote:
>
> On Monday, 18 July 2016 03:11:29 UTC+3, ondrej...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Cheers, I tried replicating my endeavours (
>> https://play.g
On Monday, 18 July 2016 03:11:29 UTC+3, ondrej...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Cheers, I tried replicating my endeavours (
> https://play.golang.org/p/Qxoo2ASac6), sorry if it's still too verbose.
> It's essentially rewriting the inbuilt ast.Node into a simpler nested
> struct and then walking it.
>
> In
Cheers, I tried replicating my endeavours
(https://play.golang.org/p/Qxoo2ASac6), sorry if it's still too verbose.
It's essentially rewriting the inbuilt ast.Node into a simpler nested
struct and then walking it.
In testing the performance, I started adding algebraic expressions, which
make my
On Friday, 8 July 2016 16:25:40 UTC+3, Ondrej wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I have a model with variables, let's call them a, b, c, ..., z. These are
> numerical values (time series loaded from a database) and I let the user
> specify their relationships in a JSON, say 'z = 12; x = a + 2/3 + 3*c; y =
> l
11 matches
Mail list logo
