Hi,
With [VAR]
https://blog.merovius.de/posts/2018-06-03-why-doesnt-go-have-variance-in/
we review type diaspora into possibility space. Perhaps the assertion that
the abstract operand is incapable of supporting the implications of its
communication.
Initially, [GST] https://github.com/syntelos/
Full explanation here:
https://blog.merovius.de/posts/2018-06-03-why-doesnt-go-have-variance-in/
On Saturday 6 January 2024 at 11:55:27 UTC John Pritchard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thinking about types and their conception, I could avoid the type
> assertion boilerplate and rationalize the type membershi
Hi,
Thinking about types and their conception, I could avoid the type assertion
boilerplate and rationalize the type membership relationship if this code
compiled.
Best,
John
On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 3:21 AM Tamás Gulácsi wrote:
> Where does TestObject implement the Comparable interface, esp.
Where does TestObject implement the Comparable interface, esp. the Compare
method?
I don't see such in that rep.
The implemented TestObject.Compare method has different signature: it
requests a TestObject, not a Comparable interface, as your spec!
This is only the first error.
The second is that
