If you want to do FP and only FP then you will be heartsick for an ML-like
language and should use one of those. However there is a lot of room between
"no FP" and "only FP"... call this "semi-functional" and Go accommodates this
well.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
This has me piqued. How do you do recursion without tail call optimization? As
far as I know, Go compiler doesn't do tail call optimization. The heart of FP
lies in the composability of function. Go supports higher order function, so
you can compose functions albeit in a limited way. Without gen
I've not had any trouble doing functional programming in Go. Here's a snippet
of a combinator-based parseri wrote...
https://bitbucket.org/snippets/patrickdlogan/kE9bn/fp-in-go-is-not-bad-considering-the-simple
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golan
Go is an imperative programming language, so it will be difficult to do any
functional programming in Go. However, beyond that, Go does not lock you into
any particular programming paradigm. You are free to choose anything from
procedural to object oriented or anything in between and beyond. Go
This might help.
https://talks.golang.org/2012/splash.article
-rob
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 3:13 AM, Mayank Acharya
wrote:
> Dear all,
> I am new to Go language.
>
> I searched a lot to understand it's paradigm structure but still not
> getting clear idea about that.
>
> Please if anyone can e
Dear all,
I am new to Go language.
I searched a lot to understand it's paradigm structure but still not
getting clear idea about that.
Please if anyone can explain, go language follows which programming
paradigm with some clear example for understanding.
I really appreciate responses.
Thank y
