I think we should have an effort to gather learnings from these efforts and
make Go2 proposals as appropriate. Perhaps best done simply by encouraging
these developers to say what they need changed, added, or removed and why.
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 11:11 AM ct via golang-nuts <
golang-nuts@google
Michael,
Thanks for mentioning Biscuit. I saw the paper a while back and have been
toying with the idea of combining it it with the GoKrazy userland (
https://gokrazy.org/) to produce a small, pure-Go OS of some kind.
Best regards,
Charlton Trezevant
On Monday, December 10, 2018 at 9:24:43 P
oops. left out a key link:
https://github.com/mit-pdos/biscuit
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 1:23 PM Michael Jones
wrote:
> Read about Biscuit:
> https://pdos.csail.mit.edu/papers/biscuit.pdf
>
> https://www.usenix.org/sites/default/files/conference/protected-files/osdi18_slides_cutler.pdf
>
> This i
Read about Biscuit:
https://pdos.csail.mit.edu/papers/biscuit.pdf
https://www.usenix.org/sites/default/files/conference/protected-files/osdi18_slides_cutler.pdf
This is encouraging--smart people making the most of Go in a new area, as
it is today, without an active iterative feedback loop. Several
Can Plan9 reborn as a *guest* OS atop of Golang runtime?
Maybe somebody works on a clustering system can expand Go runtime to
natively and transparently run over Beowulf-style message passing clusters?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" g