On Sunday, May 27, 2018 at 1:22:58 AM UTC+10, Li Jianhua wrote:
>
>
>
> Will C++ do move more often and do copy less often with its specific move
> semantics. C++ will do move whenever possible, right?
>
Perhaps. It's difficult to tell, because C++ is a horribly complicated
language. Will C++
On Saturday, May 26, 2018 at 11:22:58 AM UTC-4, Li Jianhua wrote:
>
>
> From: Ian Lance Taylor >
> Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2018 2:56 PM
> Subject: Re: [go-nuts] Does Golang need the innovation of C++ move
> semantics too
> To: Li Jianhua >
> Cc: >
>
>
On Saturday, May 26, 2018 at 11:22:58 AM UTC-4, Li Jianhua wrote:
>
>
> From: Ian Lance Taylor >
> Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2018 2:56 PM
> Subject: Re: [go-nuts] Does Golang need the innovation of C++ move
> semantics too
> To: Li Jianhua >
> Cc: >
>
>
From: Ian Lance Taylor
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2018 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: [go-nuts] Does Golang need the innovation of C++ move semantics too
To: Li Jianhua
Cc:
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 8:15 PM, Li Jianhua wrote:
>
> Why does C++ introduce move semantics anyway? What problems is it go
On Sat, 26 May 2018 03:15:45 +
Li Jianhua wrote:
> 1. Why does C++ introduce move semantics anyway? What problems is
> it going to solve? 2. How come Golang, C (Without ++) don’t have
> that move semantics yet? Will they need the move soon?
>
C++ is a language used among other things fo
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 8:15 PM, Li Jianhua wrote:
>
> Why does C++ introduce move semantics anyway? What problems is it going to
> solve?
> How come Golang, C (Without ++) don’t have that move semantics yet? Will
> they need the move soon?
Move semantics in C++ permit classes that are expensive
1. Why does C++ introduce move semantics anyway? What problems is it going
to solve?
2. How come Golang, C (Without ++) don’t have that move semantics yet? Will
they need the move soon?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
