Thank you Thomas for insight!
On Thursday, April 20, 2017 at 10:21:23 PM UTC+2, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
wrote:
>
> The other way is to add the c to its conjugate and then add the imaginary
> part, using cmplx.Conj. But that really amounts to what you're doing
> already.
>
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at
It would be natural if real(c) and imag(c) were lvalues
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 1:21 PM 'Thomas Bushnell, BSG' via golang-nuts <
golang-nuts@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> The other way is to add the c to its conjugate and then add the imaginary
> part, using cmplx.Conj. But that really amounts to wh
The other way is to add the c to its conjugate and then add the imaginary
part, using cmplx.Conj. But that really amounts to what you're doing
already.
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 3:20 AM Val wrote:
> Hello folks
> To keep real part of a complex, and set its imag part, I'm doing
> c = complex(real
Hello folks
To keep real part of a complex, and set its imag part, I'm doing
c = complex(real(c), -5.0)
Is there a more concise way, something like c.imag = -5.0 ? I know this
one doesn't compile, but I may be missing something obvious.
--
You received this message because you are subscrib
