YES! This looks like it is exactly what I needed!
Thanks!
Glen
On Friday, December 15, 2017 at 3:55:51 PM UTC-5, Ian Cottrell wrote:
>
> You could just use the go/types package to typecheck the result instead of
> compiling it, depending on exactly what you want to check that may be
> enough.
>
You could just use the go/types package to typecheck the result instead of
compiling it, depending on exactly what you want to check that may be
enough.
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 8:37 AM Tamás Gulácsi wrote:
> When you invoke "go test", it compiles a test binary and calls that.
> Why can't you ju
When you invoke "go test", it compiles a test binary and calls that.
Why can't you just repeat that?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+u
Hello,
Apologies if this has already been discussed.
I have a go tool (chidley - https://github.com/gnewton/chidley) that
converts xml to Go struct code by examining a sample file (perhaps very
large) of the XML (It can also generate Java JAXB code...).
Production examples of generated structs:
