On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 10:52 PM Brian Zhao wrote:
>
> Out of curiosity, would it be possible to have a workaround for the infinite
> lookahead problem?
>
> I happened to see a similar issue mentioned when implementing Swift Generics:
> https://github.com/apple/swift/blob/5bdc5ccd61cd43217e4f4e3
On Wednesday, June 17, 2020 at 5:50:24 PM UTC-7, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 9:36 AM Charles Crete > wrote:
> >
> > Based on the new proposal, having the type parameters as () seems very
> confusing, as now 3 things in a row use ():
> > - Type parameters
> > - Functio
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:38 PM Brian Zhao wrote:
> Would something similar work in go's parser? I'm personally in favor of
> the <> syntax, since it's very similar to other languages (C++, Swift,
> Rust, Java, C#).
>
>
It is just another parameter. I wouldn't give it special syntactical
treatmen
Out of curiosity, would it be possible to have a workaround for the
infinite lookahead problem?
I happened to see a similar issue mentioned when implementing Swift
Generics:
https://github.com/apple/swift/blob/5bdc5ccd61cd43217e4f4e3515e32eb45e728df0/docs/Generics.rst#parsing-issues,
and the propo
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 9:36 AM Charles Crete wrote:
>
> Based on the new proposal, having the type parameters as () seems very
> confusing, as now 3 things in a row use ():
> - Type parameters
> - Function parameters/arguments
> - Return tuple
>
> This results in code like (from the draft):
> fu
more and more like Java..
BR
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:36 PM Charles Crete wrote:
> Based on the new proposal, having the type parameters as () seems very
> confusing, as now 3 things in a row use ():
> - Type parameters
> - Function parameters/arguments
> - Return tuple
>
> This results in c
Based on the new proposal, having the type parameters as () seems very
confusing, as now 3 things in a row use ():
- Type parameters
- Function parameters/arguments
- Return tuple
This results in code like (from the draft):
func Stringify(type T Stringer)(s []T) (ret []string) {
for _, v := rang
