Here's a proposal for a syntactic modification to the draft proposal that
removes explicit type parameters from functions, and just uses generic types
directly (e.g., the new interface types):
https://github.com/golang/go/issues/39669
This would go a long way toward simplifying the syntax and a
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:54 PM Alexander Morozov wrote:
>
> For example consider this example https://play.golang.org/p/rfccpBoFIJN
> There is no generics involved, but for person reading the code there will be
> additional cognitive load to recognize that it's returned closure call and
> not g
For example consider this example https://play.golang.org/p/rfccpBoFIJN
There is no generics involved, but for person reading the code there will
be additional cognitive load to recognize that it's returned closure call
and not generic function call.
I wonder how could we avoid this confusion (ap
