I think this has merit. “Feels” Go-Like to me and is very easy to read.
> On Jul 21, 2020, at 10:56 AM, Kh Af wrote:
>
> Forgive me for making a new thread, I felt the older ones had run their
> course, and I had trouble deciding who to reply to.
>
> I would like to propose a simpler syntax wh
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 9:51 AM Kh Af wrote:
>
> Forgive me for making a new thread, I felt the older ones had run their
> course, and I had trouble deciding who to reply to.
>
> I would like to propose a simpler syntax which looks a bit more Go-like (to
> me)
> is more terse, has no ambiguity a
Forgive me for making a new thread, I felt the older ones had run their
course, and I had trouble deciding who to reply to.
I would like to propose a simpler syntax which looks a bit more Go-like (to
me)
is more terse, has no ambiguity and does not require any new bracket types.
Here it goes:
