Thankyou for your reply - my responses are embedded below..
On Friday, May 24, 2019 at 1:12:43 AM UTC-4, Jan Mercl wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 3:05 AM > wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately, after fitting the code with KeepAlive() calls (some
> probably superfluous), the issues and their freque
Unfortunately, after fitting the code with KeepAlive() calls (some probably
superfluous), the issues and their frequency have not notably changed. It
did allow me to remove the hack I had put in LockST() described in my
original note though. I've even gone as far as commenting out the
finalizer
Thank you very much Ian. Being new to the language, I was unaware of
KeepAlive() but had been wondering how you kept the GC's aggressive
tendencies under control.
I know what I'll be doing today..
Steve
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nut
