I don't think there is a way, but is there a way to specify a minimum b.N?
So we have a bunch of benchmarks, but some are benchmarking things that
take milliseconds and some seconds. So specifying benchtime like 30s makes
the whole build run too slow.
--
You received this message because you a
Anyone know if there is a plan for the 1.8.1 in terms of time? It seems to
have issues building up on it.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-
Yes and I'll wait for that change, thanks!
On Friday, March 3, 2017 at 2:01:25 PM UTC-8, bradfitz wrote:
>
> I'm not sure I understand what the bug report here is.
>
> Is this https://github.com/golang/go/issues/16100 ?
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 3:06 PM, >
> wrote:
>
>> A few weeks ago we impl
A few weeks ago we implemented a context that given some readClosers and
writeClosers would track if any were idle and eventually cancel the
context. We use this for handlers in our server.
We seem to be having a crash though where we are effectively returning from
a handler, and yet a read/writ
phew thx, thought I was going crazy there.
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 5:27:22 PM UTC-8, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 12:54 PM, >
> wrote:
> > I am trying to switch from a 32 bit standalone ndk android toolchain to
> the
> > 64 bit one. The only changes I have mad
I am trying to switch from a 32 bit standalone ndk android toolchain to the
64 bit one. The only changes I have made are the toolchain and using
GOARCH=arm64 instead of GOARCH=arm when build but I am getting a list of
errors like:
internal/**/**.go:715: offset out of range: 782
01448 (/go/src/*
Anyone mind lending some weight/priority to a fix for the issue above? :D
On Saturday, November 19, 2016 at 6:19:50 PM UTC-8, jonathan...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> https://github.com/golang/go/issues/17985
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts"
https://github.com/golang/go/issues/17985
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https:
Actually it turns out that the tests from the http2 client writing into a
request and the http2 server reading from the request is slow. That is
despite whether the http2 server is on the server end of the tcp connection
or the client end. This is between two machines with a 55ms latency. Scp is
Forgot to note that if I flip the coffee around to the "normal" case where the
serveconn is done by the server the speed is as expected over WAN.
Are there some internal settings different for the client vs server?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"g
I would be interested in seeing this happen.
On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 7:36:31 PM UTC-7, Jonathan Pittman wrote:
>
> Well me too! I am looking to see what level of interest there is in the
> Go community to see this happen. I am also looking for people who are
> interested in working on thi
Ah, sounds good. By chance is there an estimated date on that? :D
On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 2:49:54 PM UTC-7, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 1:09 PM, >
> wrote:
> > Or another example https://github.com/golang/go/issues/16333. Its in
> master
> > but not the release-bra
Or another example https://github.com/golang/go/issues/16333. Its in master
but not the release-branch.go1.7.
On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 12:31:13 PM UTC-7, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:11 PM, >
> wrote:
> > Why are the other changes to be released but not related to
Specifically this one https://github.com/golang/go/issues/16308 but perhaps
there are others.
On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 12:31:13 PM UTC-7, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:11 PM, >
> wrote:
> > Why are the other changes to be released but not related to this
> security
Why are the other changes to be released but not related to this security
issue not in rc2?
On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 9:59:54 AM UTC-7, Chris Broadfoot wrote:
>
> A security-related issue was recently reported in Go's net/http/cgi
> package and net/http package when used in a CGI environment.
Why is that?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
I love the tool github.com/kardianos/govendor.
Works with the standard go tools and does nothing more or less than I need.
I use it for libraries and commands and it rolls it all up.
On Tuesday, July 12, 2016 at 1:15:29 PM UTC-7, Johann Höchtl wrote:
>
> I use godep. There has been lots of rumour
Anyone have an idea when 1.7 will be out?
On Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 4:08:51 PM UTC-7, Shawn Milochik wrote:
>
> Some really important and use stuff. Check this out:
>
> https://blog.golang.org/context
>
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-
It seems that it is not well defined what happens when you get an error.
Looking at the os.File implementation the returned n value is always zero
on error. But isn't it possible that the underlying call can error but
still have seeked some?
The reader and writer docs are clear :)
--
You rece
19 matches
Mail list logo
