Re: [go-nuts] Question about the spec: Method Sets and Pointer Receivers

Please go ahead, Tim. I’m not really worried about credit for one sentence. You can mention me in the comments if you’d like. Gregg On Tuesday, February 6, 2018 at 1:11:10 AM UTC-7, thec...@netflix.com wrote: > > Hey Gregg > > I think that would make it more clear and looks great. I wouldn't w

Re: [go-nuts] Question about the spec: Method Sets and Pointer Receivers

You're right. I do think expanding the section on method sets is worthwhile because that section *seems* to have the complete set of rules. But any addition needs to be clear, concise *and* correct. How about: ... Additionally, an addressable v

Re: [go-nuts] Question about the spec: Method Sets and Pointer Receivers

This issue once puzzled me, too. It would help to add something to the spec section on method sets . I suggest something like this at the very end of the second paragraph: ... Additionally, if a receiver of type T is *addressable

[go-nuts] Re: Speeding up multiple regexp matches

A couple of years ago I worked on a project, in Go, to parse multiple regular expressions into a single DFA (state machine). There's a demo website at regex.cs.arizona.edu The source code for everything (website + underlying library) is on GitHub at github.com/proebsting/re Gregg Townse