At the moment func declarations leave it for the user, depending on whether
the original was written on one line or not.
gofmt will change:
func hi(){fmt.Println("Hi.")}
func bye(){
fmt.Println("Bye.")}
into:
func hi() { fmt.Println("Hi.") }
func bye() {
fmt.Pri
> It's definitely expected that people will simply use pointers for these
types. Why do you find it useful to do otherwise?
I'm using the contents of big.Int, etc directly so that they act like
int64, etc and interoperate with them easily in a scripting language which
overloads operators. I'v
Hi
In the "math/big" package, the Rat, Int, and Float types only have methods
that are attached to their pointer types, including the small handful of
them that don't modify the type's data, such as String() and Text().
func (x *Rat) String() { ... }
Because I'm working with the conte
