> https://golang.org/issue/35283
Yup, thanks for pointing this out.
On Tuesday, July 21, 2020 at 12:09:07 AM UTC+3 Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 12:48 PM Yuriy Yarosh wrote:
> >
> > > don't think it's going to be feasible to make it possi
ould be completely optional.
On Monday, July 20, 2020 at 10:30:20 PM UTC+3 Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 12:23 PM Yuriy Yarosh wrote:
> >
> > Basically I'm replacing net package partially rn with custom
> DPDK-enabled impl right now i.e. everything syscall.
r this, might create a golang PR soon(-ish)
after getting some opinions.
Dubbed at slack #dartarts.
On Monday, July 20, 2020 at 9:38:26 PM UTC+3 Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 7:53 AM Yuriy Yarosh wrote:
> >
> > Basically I've got some different tcp/ip st
Basically I've got some different tcp/ip stack implementations based on
DPDK and want to be able to replace existing types and methods of the stock
net package, which would allow to add DPDK support for existing apps
without any amends as a complete plug'n'play.
Same goes for JSON serialization
So, my point is that operator naming should be standardized, or we might've
introduce an additional construct like
```
type Neg operator - func() Neg
type Compare operator <=> func(Compare) int
```
On Friday, May 10, 2019 at 9:15:30 PM UTC+3, Yuriy Yarosh wrote:
>
> So, the
So, there were plenty of generics proposal, and hopefully I'll get some
constructive feedback about this one.
Syntax Example:
```
type MyGeneric interface {
int32
uint32
float32
float64
ANumber
}
type ANumber interface {
Plus(ANumber) ANumber
Minus(ANumber)
Compare(ANumber) int
So, I'm currently interested in using golang for a QNX based project, but
afaik there was no QNX port yet.
Is it even possible now ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it
