Ian you nailed it too - thanks for your advice about micro-benchmarks. I
will fix them per your suggestion.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 7:41 AM, Shubha Ramani
wrote:
> Dan thank you so much. Indeed you solved it and thanks for your advice
> about the micro-benchmarks
> too.
>
ncat $ python3 concat_test.py
> time_taken = 7210.201049922034 nsec
> ```
>
> This involved appending "; concat()" and "; mysetup()" to the stmt and
> setup parameters.
>
> On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 19:03 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 6:40 P
M, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Shubha Ramani
> wrote:
> > Please see the attached two scripts.
> >
> > Use python3 for concat_test.py.
> >
> > I'm getting 591 nsec for the micro benchmark in python and 4453 ns for
> the
>
Please see the attached two scripts.
Use python3 for concat_test.py.
I'm getting 591 nsec for the micro benchmark in python and 4453 ns for the
microbenchmark in go.
I stole this benchmark from Unicode.py of pybench, but changed it a bit.
(py36env) shubha@shubha-Z170X-UD5:~/myperformance$ go t
