> On Sep 14, 2023, at 20:44, Sapna Jayavel wrote:
>
> Do we have any Go package to support this?
# diff <(gron flare-2.json) <(gron flare-3.json)
15c15
< json.children[0].children[0].children[2].value = 6714;
---
> json.children[0].children[0].children[2].value = 67144;
https://github.com/to
> On Apr 11, 2021, at 12:22, 'Axel Wagner' via golang-nuts
> wrote:
>
> Everything around it certainly emits the air of pretentiousness that the fine
> art market is famous for.
à propos:
FTC Rules Businesses Must Disclose Whether They Actually Cool Or Just Use
Minimalist Branding
https:/
> On Apr 11, 2021, at 14:23, K. Alex Mills wrote:
>
> Well I'm convinced this is art, and once it's viewed that way, I think it
> stops being confounding and becomes delightful.
>
> Sending it to my Art History contacts for analysis. Maybe by putting it in
> the proper context we can come to
> On Apr 11, 2021, at 14:18, Axel Wagner wrote:
>
> I don't understand what you are trying to say. And I feel the fact that
> everyone talking about is either confused, or speaking in riddles instead of
> just plainly explaining what they are trying to say, speaks for itself.
--
You receiv
> On Apr 11, 2021, at 12:14, Jesper Louis Andersen
> wrote:
>
> It's an art installation. A lament to the mistakes we've made. The documents
> WE've written. But no-one reads. We revel in the 113 lines of pure
> specification, as a temple to Alan Kay. Documentation must be executable! The
> On Apr 11, 2021, at 05:11, Kurtis Rader wrote:
>
> It is nice that the specification allows for an efficient implementation. But
> I agree with Dan that your documentation is opaque, obtuse, inscrutable, etc.
> So much so that I initially thought it was some sort of April Fools Day joke.
>
> On Apr 11, 2021, at 12:22, 'Axel Wagner' via golang-nuts
> wrote:
>
> Everything around it certainly emits the air of pretentiousness that the fine
> art market is famous for.
There is a method to it:
https://lighthouse-dot-webdotdevsite.appspot.com//lh/html?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftextprotoco
> On Apr 10, 2021, at 00:41, 'Dan Kortschak' via golang-nuts
> wrote:
>
>> [1] https://textprotocol.org
>
> That's an extraordinarily and unnecessarily obtuse document.
Quite an achievement indeed :)
Even though in practice it translates to around ~113 sloc — server side:
https://github.c
> On Apr 10, 2021, at 10:49, Anthony Martin wrote:
>
> They sure are a busy little bee.
>
> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26675569
> https://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2021-April/100873.html
Systematic for sure:
https://textprotocol.org/contact
--
You received this mess
Hello,
Would you know of any go text://protocol clients? Or servers?
Thanks in advance.
[1] https://textprotocol.org
[2] https://github.com/textprotocol/public
[3] https://github.com/textprotocol/publictext
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-n
10 matches
Mail list logo
