Ah, I just re-read the thread subject: if *any* of the values are non-nil.
Sorry for the misunderstanding.
On Friday, February 16, 2018 at 3:42:23 PM UTC-7, Paul Brousseau wrote:
>
> If all of the values are non-nil, then `retnn nil, err` would not return,
> would it? Did I miss
If all of the values are non-nil, then `retnn nil, err` would not return,
would it? Did I miss something?
On Friday, February 16, 2018 at 2:38:05 PM UTC-7, Nathan Fisher wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've been contemplating alternative methods to address the "boiler plate"
> of error handling in Go. O
I think that might depend on what qualities you define as "safe"?
On Monday, February 12, 2018 at 12:43:05 PM UTC-7, dc0d wrote:
>
> Is there a way to identify a package as safe?
>
> Let's restrict the imported packages to built-in ones. Now assuming a
> package only imports "strings" and "net/u
I am working on a program to consume Go source code and maintain a running
state of that program as a user edits that source in an IDE. I have a
working implementation that *loads* the program AST representation (inc.
all imports and standard library) and runs it through a type checker, but
my
