[go-nuts] Programming paradigm.

If you want to do FP and only FP then you will be heartsick for an ML-like language and should use one of those. However there is a lot of room between "no FP" and "only FP"... call this "semi-functional" and Go accommodates this well. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

[go-nuts] Programming paradigm.

I've not had any trouble doing functional programming in Go. Here's a snippet of a combinator-based parseri wrote... https://bitbucket.org/snippets/patrickdlogan/kE9bn/fp-in-go-is-not-bad-considering-the-simple -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golan

[go-nuts] RDF "encoding"

Some CSV-specific specs are here... https://www.w3.org/blog/news/archives/5232?pk_campaign=feed&pk_kwd=csv-on-the-web-recommendations-published -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emai

Re: [go-nuts] Re: Currying in Go

Go allows functions to have multiple arguments. The upside is currying is much less necessary in languages like Go. The downside is combining one-argument functions to make new one-argument functions is syntactically more cumbersome. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to