Re: [go-nuts] go.mod go directive coverage of stdlib contract?

2023-11-06 Thread 'Kevin Gillette' via golang-nuts
t 7:19:29 PM UTC-6 Kurtis Rader wrote: > On Sat, Nov 4, 2023 at 5:05 PM 'Kevin Gillette' via golang-nuts < > golan...@googlegroups.com> wrote: > >> My unconfirmed, but perhaps mistaken understanding of the `go` directive >> in a go.mod file was that it covered

[go-nuts] go.mod go directive coverage of stdlib contract?

2023-11-04 Thread &#x27;Kevin Gillette' via golang-nuts
rationale about this contract covering the language, but not the stdlib? Thanks! Kevin Gillette -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email

[go-nuts] Clarification on the Compatibility Promise regarding Version Build Constraints

2023-10-22 Thread Kevin Gillette
g the toolchain), and if it's already not documented somewhere I failed to find, then it would be a caveat to the compatibility promise that is probably worth explicitly spelling out. Thank you! Kevin Gillette -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &q

Re: [go-nuts] Re: Generics and parentheses

2020-07-20 Thread Kevin Gillette
On Wednesday, July 15, 2020 at 6:41:51 AM UTC-6 Michal Strba wrote: > What about using a dot when specializing in bodies? > > func main() { > x := zero.() // requires a dot > } > What are all the kinds of "generic expressions" we would need to support? Go allows incomplete floati