On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 4:06:25 PM UTC+2, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 2:01 AM, > wrote:
> >
> > Generational and Compact gc have already been thought best practice. But
> > golang doesn't adopt it. Who can tell me the reason?
>
> Now let's consider a generational GC
; won't be type-assertions.
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Jan Ziak <0xe2.0x...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> A large difference between an implementable highly-optimized run-time
>> performance of feature X and the physically implemented run-time
>> pe
A large difference between an implementable highly-optimized run-time
performance of feature X and the physically implemented run-time
performance of feature X causes programmers to avoid X.
On Thursday, February 2, 2017 at 3:32:16 PM UTC+1, Marvin Renich wrote:
>
> * Marvin Renich > [170202 09:
