Re: [go-nuts] is not executable

2019-08-04 Thread Allan Edwards
re the solution. > > On Sunday, 4 August 2019 16:50:45 UTC+1, Allan Edwards wrote: >> >> I am sorry, ignore me, I figured it out. Problem in goland >> configuration. Thanks for the response. >> >> On Sunday, August 4, 2019 at 10:44:12 AM UTC-5, Alexander Kapsh

Re: [go-nuts] is not executable

2019-08-04 Thread Allan Edwards
I am sorry, ignore me, I figured it out. Problem in goland configuration. Thanks for the response. On Sunday, August 4, 2019 at 10:44:12 AM UTC-5, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 6:37 PM Allan Edwards > wrote: > > > > I have written a small console

Re: [go-nuts] is not executable

2019-08-04 Thread Allan Edwards
might be doing something weird on the build. On Sunday, August 4, 2019 at 10:44:12 AM UTC-5, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 6:37 PM Allan Edwards > wrote: > > > > I have written a small console application that has package main at the > top and the

[go-nuts] is not executable

2019-08-04 Thread Allan Edwards
1.12.7. Thanks!!! Allan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web vi

Re: [go-nuts] Windows vs Linux ReadString

2019-07-20 Thread Allan Edwards
Wow, thanks for responding guys. So I ran my exe on linux without goland and bam the readstring blocked as needed. For some reason the ReadString call is not blocking inside of goland. It seems like a great IDE but I found a weird bug. On the Windows side the ReadString blocks inside of go

[go-nuts] doubt about sync.NewCond

2017-04-20 Thread Allan
I run a demo program to learn sync.NewCond: package main import ( "fmt" "sync" "time" ) var locker = new(sync.Mutex) var cond = sync.NewCond(locker) func test(x int) { cond.L.Lock() cond.Wait() fmt.Println(x) time.Sleep(time.Second * 1) cond.L.Unlock() } func main(

[go-nuts] Re: After conn.Close, connections is still alive

2017-03-07 Thread Allan
Yes, you're right. Thannk you. 在 2017年3月8日星期三 UTC+8上午12:05:33,Howard C. Shaw III写道: > > io.Copy is going to read from one stream and write to the other, until the > read stream is closed. "Copy copies from src to dst until either EOF is > reached on src or an error occurs." So until you close