> On Jan 8, 2025, at 1:38 AM, Henry wrote:
>
> The reason people use ORMs is because they don't want to write SQL. ... A
> thin wrapper over SQL language that is portable across databases is a better
> solution.
That is insightful.
Do you know of such an existing solution that meets said re
The reason people use ORMs is because they don't want to write SQL. The
reason people don't want to write SQL is because SQL is not portable with
each database implements its own SQL variant/dialect. Switching databases
often involves rewriting the SQL instructions. But ORM is an overengineered
Jeffrey,
If modules worked like you suggested, a domain owner could be compromised,
and the cryptographic module hashes for the domain could be changed to
disrupt or infect dependencies. Version immutability prevents that: a
module version is code + current import path ownership at the time the
