> On Dec 29, 2024, at 5:11 PM, Axel Wagner
> wrote:
>
> Why don't I use the sequence versions more frequently? Because I try not to
> create huge in-memory maps and instead prefer to move logic that manipulates
> large amounts of data into a proper database.
>
> Iterators are more efficient
>
> Why don't I use the sequence versions more frequently? Because I try not
> to create huge in-memory maps and instead prefer to move logic that
> manipulates large amounts of data into a proper database.
Iterators are more efficient for small maps as well. Allocating and then
throwing away sma
> On Dec 29, 2024, at 1:38 AM, Amnon wrote:
>
> A nice thing about Go is that it is easy on the eye. Names are short, and
> easy to read. When you look at Go code, you are not faced with a wall of
> black text. The signal to noise ratio is high. Variable and function names
> general convey wha
> On Dec 29, 2024, at 1:28 AM, Axel Wagner
> wrote:
>
> At the end of the day, it's purely a question of what you think would be more
> frequently used. That should get the better name. `Values` (as is) composes
> naturally with `slices.Collect` and so you get both in one function and it
> s
